HP ProBook 650 G8 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProBook 650 G8 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87ED
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 00:29
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 48.8
1-Core 40.3
2-Core 80.2
34% 56.4 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 279
24% 208 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 37%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 87ED) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.81% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 4.3
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 2.5
2% 3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 2.81%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
773GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1265 1069 1010 1149 1071 1205 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,100
Write 1,174
Mixed 1,149
SusWrite 1128
257% 1,138 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 64.5
201% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 427
273% 307 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 187%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF4G64HZ-3G2E2 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 28.7
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 9.7
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 650 G8 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 650 G8 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback