MSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B17
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17)  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190808
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 05 '22 at 18:55
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 246
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 815
82% 667 Pts
64-Core 802
50% 802 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 126
Parallax 121
86% 117 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 106
Splatting 98.8
84% 103 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 389 416 382 416 417 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 393
Write 414
Mixed 351
SusWrite 400
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 31.2
112% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 68.7
DQ Mixed 122
95% 136 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 155 163 156 165 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 158
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 161
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
340GB free
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 123 131 122 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 124
Write 112
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 127
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 88%
WD WD1600HLFS-60G6U2 160GB
26GB free
Firmware: 04.04V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 98 92 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 97.1
Write 88.5
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 96
64% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.3
227% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 68%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
352GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 79 84 79 84 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 119
Write 126
Mixed 76
SusWrite 81.8
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 87%
Brother MFC-J4510DW 4GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3 3.2 3 3.1 3.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Read 2.5
Write 2.5
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 3.1
4% 2.57 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 2%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C15-16GIS 04CD F4-2400C15-8GNT 04CD F4-2400C15-8GNT 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.1% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 19.5
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17) Builds (Compare 14,381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $812
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback