Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161129
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateJul 05 '22 at 18:38
Run Duration353 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 88.8
1-Core 138
2-Core 272
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 746
75% 611 Pts
64-Core 750
46% 750 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 110
Parallax 101
85% 105 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 100
Splatting 99.1
80% 97.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 140 91 94 84 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 396
Mixed 379
SusWrite 159
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 61.9
206% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 109%
Great: 134%
WDBRPG0010BNC-WRSN 1TB
656GB free
Firmware: 111110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1981 1707 1717 1726 1732 1730 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 1,978
Write 2,130
Mixed 1,760
SusWrite 1,766
430% 1,908 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 74.5
260% 97.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,382
DQ Write 1,020
DQ Mixed 1,185
890% 1,195 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 321%
Great: 349%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
133GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 74 71 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49% Average
Read 98.2
Write 87.7
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 72.4
59% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 218 219 218 219 220 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 123
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 215
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Memorex USB Flash Drive 248GB
194GB free, PID 7722
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 12 14 11 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.77% Terrible
Read 30.4
Write 29.3
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 12.7
25% 20 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.77%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GVR F4-2400C15-8GVS F4-2400C15-8GVR F4-2400C15-8GVS 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 22.9
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.9
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 63: 7R 7G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
63% 47% 45 319 252 60 47.1" 1920 1080 VIZ0050 VL260M
History: Score 27: 3R 3G 3B | Score 38: 4R 4G 6B | Score 63: 7R 7G 7B
Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $655
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback