MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '22 at 06:03
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 145
2-Core 290
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,117
100% 846 Pts
64-Core 1,116
69% 1,116 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
PowerColor(148C 2409) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 135
Parallax 280
114% 185 fps
MRender 226
Gravity 152
Splatting 170
147% 182 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 120%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 443 443 299 301 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 486
Mixed 454
SusWrite 357
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 53.9
181% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 115%
Great: 129%
Pcie SSD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: ECFM13.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1626 2170 1678 974 974 972 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 1,103
Write 1,043
Mixed 1,491
SusWrite 1,399
285% 1,259 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 71.2
254% 97 MB/s
DQ Read 1,679
DQ Write 1,340
DQ Mixed 1,472
1,112% 1,497 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 275%
Great: 309%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
949GB free
Firmware: S1111A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1598 1607 1609 1608 1615 1609 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,457
Write 1,583
Mixed 989
SusWrite 1,608
318% 1,409 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 24.2
188% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 900
DQ Write 1,095
DQ Mixed 479
505% 825 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 254%
Great: 310%
Generic MassStorageClass 32GB
30GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.03% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 18.6
Mixed 10
SusWrite 12.6
20% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
59% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.03%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2666 C16 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23.9
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 23.3
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 23,340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $868
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback