Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell XPS 8900  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XJ8C4
Memory13.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191122
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJul 04 '22 at 05:55
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 55%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 168
61% 108 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 370
45% 343 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Lighting 71
Reflection 78.2
Parallax 70.3
58% 73.2 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 71.1
58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 125 120 123 170 251 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 428
Write 93.7
Mixed 182
SusWrite 158
47% 215 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 32.4
120% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 272
204% 276 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
758GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 180 182 181 179 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 150
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 174
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 107%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
472GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 111 110 112 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 93
Write 107
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 112
134% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 1.2
264% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 99%
WD Elements 2621 4TB
1TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 79 79 78 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 83.5
Write 77.9
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 78.8
101% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.7
194% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 62%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
3TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 112 107 111 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 63.1
Write 105
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 109
124% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 0.8
310% 3.37 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 6.2
DQ Mixed 0.5
229% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 65%
WD Elements 2TB
567GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 39 39 39 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 32.1
Write 36.6
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 38.4
46% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.3
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 44%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1TB
800GB free, PID 5031
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 89 83 88 86 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 79.6
Write 87.2
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 84.8
94% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 38%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 640GB
583GB free, PID 2120
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 39 39 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 34.3
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 37.9
40% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback