Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 01 '22 at 03:05
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 79
2-Core 220
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 598
61% 494 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 121
Parallax 111
90% 114 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 108
Splatting 108
88% 107 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 407 439 442 453 273 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 376
Write 454
Mixed 378
SusWrite 405
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 59.2
194% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 160
177% 298 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 117%
Great: 125%
Jmicron Generic 320GB
127GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 72
Write 41
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 77
43% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 52%
Hitachi HDT721050SLA360 500GB
183GB free, PID 1018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 42 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 42.6
Write 41.8
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 42.5
55% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 18.2
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 19.8
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $916
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback