Dell Precision T3610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision T3610
MotherboardDell Precision T3610  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180104
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 11 '19 at 13:41
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 200
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 581
60% 481 Pts
64-Core 717
44% 717 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 18.8
12% 16.1 fps
MRender 20.9
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 16.6
15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 240 230 211 186 179 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
76.5% Very good
Read 254
Write 239
Mixed 228
SusWrite 213
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 43.6
142% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 195
147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 134%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 116 118 119 120 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 108
Write 109
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 117
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
152GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 140 140 139 142 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 146
Write 112
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 139
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
64GB free, PID 102a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 20 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 34.2
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 19.4
39% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 19%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
715GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 17.8
Mixed 26
SusWrite 27
34% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 19%
Hitachi HDT721050SLA360 500GB
112GB free, PID 1018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 34
Write 34.7
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 19.6
39% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 22%
ST1750LM 000 HN-M171R 2TB
736GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.68% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 20
Mixed 19
SusWrite 20.9
27% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.68%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 35.5
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3610 Builds (Compare 2,385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback