Lenovo 43533J4

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 43533J4 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200828
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '22 at 01:29
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	46.5% Average	Memory 65.9 1-Core 31.9 2-Core 59.1 36% 52.3 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 449 33% 298 Pts	64-Core 869 54% 869 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.9% Poor	Lighting 35.2 Reflection 37.8 Parallax 36.7 29% 36.6 fps	MRender 36.3 Gravity 37.1 Splatting 26.1 26% 33.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 56,609 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 412GB free (System drive) Firmware: KB.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 287 309 304 291 308 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 309 Write 368 Mixed 325 SusWrite 294 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 16.6 4K Mixed 13.2 44% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 167 132% 183 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 102%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 102GB free Firmware: 3B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 210 220 221 219 221 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.2% Average	Read 233 Write 219 Mixed 220 SusWrite 216 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 15.2 50% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 160 120% 161 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 129%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 212GB free Firmware: B1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 187 180 190 215 177 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.4% Poor	Read 192 Write 97.3 Mixed 87.6 SusWrite 191 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 12.6 4K Mixed 8.2 30% 9.7 MB/s	DQ Read 19.7 DQ Write 19.6 DQ Mixed 16.2 13% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 100%
Amd-raid WDC WD40EZAZ-00Z 4TB 965 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 1TB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 120 123 123 122 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 102 Write 118 Mixed 77.1 SusWrite 121 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 1.1 386% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 107%
Amd-raid WDC WD40EZAZ-00Z 4TB 965 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3TB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 170 171 174 172 171 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 158 Mixed 80.9 SusWrite 170 107% 146 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 7.9 4K Mixed 1.1 414% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 107%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB 5,792 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 607GB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 65 70 77 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 82.2 Write 132 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 71.9 67% 90.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.7 189% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 88%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 530GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 83 92 90 85 89 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 142 Write 152 Mixed 85.1 SusWrite 86 86% 116 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.7 249% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 94%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1.5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 98 94 87 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 160 Write 162 Mixed 108 SusWrite 90.3 172% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.2 207% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451R7AFR8C 4x4GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 16 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	68.8% Good	MC Read 40.8 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 27.9 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 2.8 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 43533J4 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

System: Lenovo 43533J4

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x

SSD
SA400S37960G 960GBKingstonBench 70%, 56,609 samples	2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x
HG6 128GBToshibaBench 79%, 5,641 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451R7AFR8C 4x4GBHynixBench 85%, 59 samples	4x
HMT351R7CFR8A 4x4GBHynixBench 77%, 15 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16