Gigabyte GA-B365M D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B365M D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B365M D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211113
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJun 28 '22 at 19:13
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 245
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 602
68% 534 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62% Good
Lighting 80.7
Reflection 80.5
Parallax 84.3
66% 81.8 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 74.9
Splatting 62.1
55% 67.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 98 6.4 86 216 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
46% Average
Read 477
Write 7.5
Mixed 11
SusWrite 107
32% 151 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 8.6
72% 17.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46%
Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
855GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 177 174 177 181 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 156
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 179
95% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 25
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 35.7
SC Mixed 26.6
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B365M D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365M D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback