Gigabyte GA-B365M D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B365M D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B365M D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211113
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 14:15
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 94.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 249
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 526
64% 492 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3125 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.8% Good
Lighting 84.2
Reflection 86.8
Parallax 0.3
69% 57.1 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 79.3
Splatting 65.2
57% 70.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 4.9 197 43 7.1 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 508
Write 212
Mixed 288
SusWrite 87.3
60% 274 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 7.6
DQ Mixed 0.5
18% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57%
Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
866GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 176 175 179 178 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 174
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 174
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
90% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 25
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 26.3
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B365M D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365M D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback