Toshiba Satellite Pro C50-B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 70% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemToshiba Satellite Pro C50-B  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA ZSWAA
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '22 at 02:52
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 70%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 121
54% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 186
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F910) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.63% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 5.1
2% 3.3 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.63%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S650 240GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0401A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 361 395 378 394 394 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 446
Write 384
Mixed 380
SusWrite 375
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 13.9
103% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 31.2
87% 180 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Kingston 9905469-136.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 17.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite Pro C50-B Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite Pro C50-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback