Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 211%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 94% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory56 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211110
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 27 '22 at 19:49
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
CPU Throttled 94%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$207
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 73.7
1-Core 198
2-Core 409
116% 227 Pts
4-Core 818
8-Core 1,583
142% 1,200 Pts
64-Core 2,484
154% 2,484 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499
MSI(1462 5052) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 5125 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
162% Outstanding
Lighting 239
Reflection 215
Parallax 208
195% 221 fps
MRender 257
Gravity 163
Splatting 133
145% 184 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 162%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M450 500GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM32.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1186 2261 1069 439 132 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 1,625
Write 2641
Mixed 1540
SusWrite 870
377% 1,669 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 230
4K Mixed 73.5
301% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,491
DQ Write 1,334
DQ Mixed 1,358
1,033% 1,394 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 272%
Great: 341%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
335GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2039 1495 269 271 202 198 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,595
Write 1,597
Mixed 1,744
SusWrite 746
320% 1,420 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 70.7
257% 95.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,603
DQ Write 1,541
DQ Mixed 1,536
1,163% 1,560 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 258%
Great: 365%
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 418 386 382 392 379 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 458
Mixed 375
SusWrite 401
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 41.3
146% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 256
215% 314 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 103%
Great: 117%
Corsair MP600 PRO 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EIFM21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3817 4160 4013 4226 4041 3624 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
455% Outstanding
Read 1,479
Write 1,695
Mixed 1123
SusWrite 3,980
471% 2,069 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 58.5
254% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,668
DQ Write 1784
DQ Mixed 1,792
1,330% 1,748 MB/s
Poor: 208%
This bench: 455%
Great: 589%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 34.4
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 29.2
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 15,679 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 - $187

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,411
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback