Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DRG-Q
Memory114.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '22 at 12:14
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 v3
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 820
71% 606 Pts
64-Core 1,608
100% 1,608 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.9% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 111
Parallax 185
97% 138 fps
MRender 94.7
Gravity 139
Splatting 77.3
83% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 98%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1427 1372 1357 1326 1296 1274 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,030
Write 1,441
Mixed 635
SusWrite 1,342
303% 1,362 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 72.9
267% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 952
DQ Write 682
DQ Mixed 632
522% 755 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 282%
Great: 306%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
1TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 140 140 137 142 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 137
Write 138
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 138
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
241% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 104%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
605GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 96 95 96 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 106
Write 108
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 94.8
71% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 99%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70
13GB free
Firmware: 01.01K02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 124 128 122 126 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 104
Write 112
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 122
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 96%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
57GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 101
Write 53.1
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 20.2
49% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
46% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 30%
Lexar JumpDrive P20 USB 3.0 64GB-$20
9GB free, PID a212
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 207
Write 163
Mixed 136
206% 169 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.7
93% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC M393A2K40BB1-CRC M393A2G40DB1-CRC M393A2K40BB1-CRC M393A2G40EB1-CPB M393A2G40EB1-CPB M393A2G40EB1-CPB M393A2G40EB1-CPB 128GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97.3% Outstanding
MC Read 44.7
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 34.9
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 19.1
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $580
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback