MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI (MS-7D25)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics85.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D25
MotherboardMSI PRO Z690-A WIFI (MS-7D25)  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211206
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateJun 23 '22 at 05:30
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 95%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700F-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 78.8
1-Core 198
2-Core 384
115% 220 Pts
4-Core 743
8-Core 1,466
131% 1,104 Pts
64-Core 2,219
137% 2,219 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 109%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 112
Parallax 104
87% 108 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 103
Splatting 100
82% 99.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
795GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2125 2143 2097 2095 2044 2056 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 1,497
Write 1,910
Mixed 1,755
SusWrite 2,093
412% 1,814 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 75.6
264% 93.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,825
DQ Write 1,272
DQ Mixed 1,489
1,128% 1,529 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 338%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
443GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2010 1805 391 230 214 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 1,546
Write 2,001
Mixed 1,634
SusWrite 806
338% 1,497 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 83.2
288% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,944
DQ Write 1,385
DQ Mixed 1,609
1,217% 1,646 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 274%
Great: 365%
Sony MRW-G1 128GB
97GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 354 351 349 346 351 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74% Very good
Read 379
Write 338
Mixed 350
SusWrite 352
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 31.3
103% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 91.7
DQ Mixed 171
113% 134 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74%
Great: 74%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 128GB
119GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 87 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 87.5
Write 82
Mixed 69
SusWrite 86.5
110% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.6
242% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B5200C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
170% Outstanding
MC Read 68.9
MC Write 67.9
MC Mixed 63.4
191% 66.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 48.5
SC Mixed 33.5
99% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 170%
Great: 187%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRO Z690-A WIFI (MS-7D25) Builds (Compare 6,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 251%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI (MS-7D25)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback