Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_FX516PE (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX516PE
Memory	20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210827
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '22 at 12:23
Run Duration	288 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	87%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11370H 12,227 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 67.9 1-Core 132 2-Core 256 82% 152 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 570 54% 451 Pts	64-Core 570 35% 570 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 13DC) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Lighting 24.3 Reflection 29 Parallax 29.9 20% 27.7 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 20%
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop) 35,839 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Asus(1043 13DC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.76 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.4% Average	Lighting 57.1 Reflection 82.2 Parallax 53.4 46% 64.2 fps	MRender 62.8 Gravity 46.7 Splatting 41.6 40% 50.4 fps
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB 18,245 User benchmarks, average bench 197% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 121 29 25 17 152 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	143% Outstanding	Read 1793 Write 1,194 Mixed 699 SusWrite 114 209% 950 MB/s	4K Read 49.6 4K Write 55.7 4K Mixed 49.5 168% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 438 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 150 143% 233 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 297%
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLW256HEHP-000L2 256GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 189% 175GB free Firmware: 4L1QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 321 319 322 318 319 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	180% Outstanding	Read 1,544 Write 1,007 Mixed 654 SusWrite 346 196% 888 MB/s	4K Read 51.8 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 66.2 226% 79 MB/s	DQ Read 867 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 771 528% 662 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 261%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2G44AM0-CWE Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 32GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 3200, 3200 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	82.1% Excellent	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 34 MC Mixed 25.9 87% 30.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 35.5 SC Mixed 17.3 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 94%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-11370HIntelBench 74%, 12,227 samples	898x
Core i5-11300HIntelBench 71%, 8,880 samples	590x

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	866x
RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)NvidiaBench 61%, 35,839 samples	622x

SSD
SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 7,990 samples	501x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	303x
SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TBNvmeBench 208%, 3,489 samples	230x

RAM
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	166x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 16GBSamsungBench 69%, 3,193 samples	138x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2B1 Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GBMicronBench 58%, 1,942 samples	134x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16