Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3540 17,036 User benchmarks, average bench 33% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	31.5% Below average	Memory 47.1 1-Core 23.9 2-Core 47.8 26% 39.6 Pts	4-Core 93 8-Core 95.4 12% 94.2 Pts	64-Core 94.9 6% 94.9 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 093A) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.6% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 0.7 0% 0.53 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.6% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB 6,756 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: S4200102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 240 241 239 240 236 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	70% Very good	Read 255 Write 240 Mixed 238 SusWrite 239 55% 243 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 35.7 116% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 178 139% 191 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.7% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 7.1 22% 7.53 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 4.5 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3540IntelBench 33%, 17,036 samples	38x
Celeron N2940IntelBench 33%, 3,995 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	33x
GeForce 820MNvidiaBench 4%, 9,266 samples	6x

SSD
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	3x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	15x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	6x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	4x

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $39