Medion Erazer P6661 MD60303

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMedion Erazer P6661 MD60303  (all builds)
MotherboardMedion D15SHN
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '22 at 18:46
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 41%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 138
58% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 236
32% 236 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Device(1B0A 2281) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.15% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 6.9
5% 9.8 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-000L2 256GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT21L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 48 60 64 53 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 420
Write 404
Mixed 284
SusWrite 74.6
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 48.6
168% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 320
247% 338 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 108%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB
153GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 77 77 76 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 85.7
Write 93.5
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 76.1
52% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF ACR16D3LS1KBG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 19.3
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 18
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer P6661 MD60303 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer P6661 MD60303

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback