Lenovo F0EK007HUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo F0EK007HUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3701
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190812
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 18 '22 at 17:59
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 572
58% 472 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Legend(17AA 3701) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9030
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 7.6
5% 6.77 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.7
7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1002 1212 1082 982 304 304 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 811
Write 1,253
Mixed 750
SusWrite 814
205% 907 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 58.2
190% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 983
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 737
517% 671 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 170%
Great: 279%
USB Flash DISK 16GB
11GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 9.6 9.6 9.6 11 9.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
5.86% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 9.5
13% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.86%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
60.4% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 16.6
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 18.5
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F0EK007HUS Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0EK007HUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback