Lenovo 4524CB9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4524CB9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '22 at 20:12
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 167
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 322
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 86E1) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 18.9
Parallax 18.8
15% 18.7 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 17.3
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$68
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 271 272 134 159 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 414
Write 264
Mixed 298
SusWrite 223
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 29.9
100% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 197
165% 238 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
248GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 102 102 102 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 110
Write 103
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 101
71% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4524CB9 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4524CB9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback