Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '22 at 18:40
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 141
2-Core 262
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 623
72% 560 Pts
64-Core 731
45% 731 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Zotac(19DA 2370) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1557 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.9% Above average
Lighting 61.7
Reflection 74.8
Parallax 65.5
50% 67.3 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 60.2
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,545
Write 1,749
Mixed 1,390
349% 1,561 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 77.5
286% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,339
DQ Write 894
DQ Mixed 1,111
830% 1,114 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 276%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
36GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 295 294 297 298 299 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 487
Mixed 421
SusWrite 315
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 64.5
219% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 368
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
128GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 93 91 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 93.1
Write 102
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 92
63% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 58%
SAMSUNG HD161HJ 160GB
26GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 37.1
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 38.5
50% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 18%
WD Elements 2TB
128GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 75 75 75 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 98.1
Write 104
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 75.1
112% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 36.1
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 35.9
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,583 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $696
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback