Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100903
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '17 at 15:35
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Memory 97.2 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 198 77% 131 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 497 53% 424 Pts	64-Core 497 31% 497 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 387.92 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	118% Outstanding	Lighting 153 Reflection 193 Parallax 200 125% 182 fps	MRender 129 Gravity 178 Splatting 126 117% 144 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 110 27198438 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 -7301444395293 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2416 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 456 (B1) Unknown 0 0 8 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 82 51544981537 (C2) HDA temperature 33 82 51544981537 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 27198438 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 27198438 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 27198438 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 18252 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6125 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6125 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8637	34.8% Below average	Read 212 Write 127 Mixed 135 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 10.2 56% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 67.9 DQ Mixed 10 18% 35 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 73%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 289GB free Firmware: CR100-12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7616 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10448 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 12 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 20651 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5552 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 230122 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 393409 (BC) Unknown 83 83 1759 (BE) vendor-specific 73 42 27 (C2) HDA temperature 154 64 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 230122 (C4) Reallocation count 99 99 12 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 849 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	30.5% Below average	Read 48.6 Write 57.7 Mixed 39.7 36% 48.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.32 68% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	54.3% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 15.3 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 17 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 49.4 81% 49.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	605x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	291x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	88x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	116x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	79x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	67x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	55x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	308x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	253x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	185x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16