Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100903
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '17 at 20:01
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 97.4 1-Core 94.4 2-Core 181 74% 124 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 461 49% 390 Pts	64-Core 464 29% 464 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 162 Reflection 206 Parallax 207 132% 192 fps	MRender 133 Gravity 184 Splatting 131 121% 149 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 104 7388661 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 65403761991393 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2405 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 447 (B1) Unknown 0 0 8 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 82 51544981537 (C2) HDA temperature 33 82 51544981537 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 7388661 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 7388661 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 7388661 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 18203 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6102 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6102 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8602	43.2% Average	Read 265 Write 126 Mixed 124 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 12.1 78% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 30.3 DQ Write 66.7 DQ Mixed 13.2 20% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 73%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 289GB free Firmware: CR100-12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 6016 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10435 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 12 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 20649 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5541 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 91899 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 393409 (BC) Unknown 83 83 1759 (BE) vendor-specific 71 42 29 (C2) HDA temperature 151 64 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 91899 (C4) Reallocation count 99 99 12 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 849 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	27.9% Poor	Read 49.2 Write 47.9 Mixed 39.3 34% 45.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 0.95 4K Mixed 0.3 65% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	54.3% Above average	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 15.6 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 48.8 82% 48.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	606x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	293x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	89x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	116x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	89x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	80x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	67x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	55x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	311x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	253x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	185x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16