Asus M52BC_M32BC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Asus M52BC_M32BC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M52BC_M32BC
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '22 at 18:14
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8310 1,697 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 52.9 2-Core 102 53% 81 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 293 30% 240 Pts	64-Core 312 19% 312 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCT-128M3S 128GB 2,346 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: VQDC SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 200 197 194 194 164 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 355 Write 197 Mixed 206 SusWrite 190 53% 237 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 36.5 4K Mixed 27.8 86% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 267 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 149 134% 205 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 82%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB 23,667 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 17GB free Firmware: CA14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 28 25 36 26 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	8.07% Terrible	Read 0.3 Write 8.5 Mixed 18 SusWrite 27.6 10% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 59% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 8.07% Great: 61%
Seagate ST2000NM0055-1V4104 2TB 515 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 1.5TB free Firmware: TN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 191 187 186 185 182 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 164 Mixed 106 SusWrite 184 116% 158 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1.2 267% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 113%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 54GB free Firmware: 18.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 77 77 71 73 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 78.8 Write 73.3 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 75.7 51% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.9% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 8.1 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M52BC_M32BC Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M52BC_M32BC

CPU
FX-8310AMDBench 60%, 1,697 samples	31x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	14x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	10x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	2x
SSD 500GBSeagateBench 90%, 1,930 samples	2x
Solid State Disk 1TBSpccBench 79%, 17,192 samples	2x

RAM
ASU16D3LU1KBGR/4G 4x4GBKingstonBench 42%, 103 samples	5x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	4x
ASU16D3LU1KFG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 651 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16