Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5300U 29,898 User benchmarks, average bench 42% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	54.1% Above average	Memory 70.1 1-Core 91.5 2-Core 156 62% 106 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 221 30% 222 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Dell(1028 062B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	3.75% Terrible	Lighting 4.7 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 6.6 4% 4.33 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 5 Splatting 4 4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.75% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Geonix 240GB 256GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 204GB free (System drive) SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 317 369 349 372 370 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	84.9% Excellent	Read 385 Write 405 Mixed 343 SusWrite 345 83% 369 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 80.4 4K Mixed 32.5 126% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 189 153% 210 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 8.6 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 10.7 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,631x
GeForce 830MNvidiaBench 6%, 1,288 samples	56x
GeForce 840MNvidiaBench 9%, 20,978 samples	52x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	68x
LCH-256V2S-11 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonBench 79%, 1,558 samples	57x
PM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 2,882 samples	52x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	275x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	101x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	69x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28