Lenovo 11CVS2HJ00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 11CVS2HJ00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3164
Memory40.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 15:12
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500-$140
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 81.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 247
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 796
78% 636 Pts
64-Core 1,014
63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 3164) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.93% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 8.6
5% 8.07 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 11.5
8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.93%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
541GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 406 370 379 390 372 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 461
Mixed 304
SusWrite 382
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 37.3
126% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 166
165% 266 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 133%
SKHynix_HFS512GDE9X081N 512GB
351GB free
Firmware: 41720C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1270 883 842 1071 951 885 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,348
Write 535
Mixed 1706
SusWrite 984
309% 1,393 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 65.3
217% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,016
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 505
422% 630 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 252%
Great: 328%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB
45GB free
Firmware: 506ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 157 153 160 157 159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 313
Write 206
Mixed 235
SusWrite 159
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 35.8
124% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 104
106% 171 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 83%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 136 135 136 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 99.7
Write 106
Mixed 56
SusWrite 135
72% 99 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 104%
WDC WD64 00AAKS-65A7B0 640GB
596GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 16 17 18 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.41% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 16.7
Mixed 15
SusWrite 17.1
22% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
49% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.41%
Great: 35%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
1TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 36.1
Write 35.2
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 37.8
46% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 48%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
379GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 31.2
Write 35.2
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 4.8
29% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.4
210% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD48G320081 029E CMK32GX4M2C3200C18 Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 029E CMK32GX4M2C3200C18 48GB
3200, 2133, 3200, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.6% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 19.8
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 11CVS2HJ00 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 11CVS2HJ00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback