PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P7P55D-E EVO (all builds) |
Memory | 2.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100827 |
Uptime | 1.8 Days |
Run Date | Jun 08 '22 at 08:33 |
Run Duration | 284 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8423) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
|
19.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 167 111 91 95 94 MB/s
|
70%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
898GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 184 185 184 186 186 MB/s
|
86.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Ext Hard Disk 400GB
39GB free, PID 021b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 20 MB/s
|
12.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Ext Hard Disk 500GB
61GB free, PID 021b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 20 MB/s
|
12.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 12GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 13x |
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 7x |
Core i7 880IntelBench 71%, 808 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 4x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 3x |
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $660 |