MSI MAG B560M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7D17)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive436% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D17
MotherboardMSI MAG B560M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7D17)  (all builds)
Memory59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 01:56
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Memory 89.9
1-Core 155
2-Core 311
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 910
89% 730 Pts
64-Core 1,104
68% 1,104 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.96
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30% Below average
Lighting 38
Reflection 42
Parallax 39.4
31% 39.8 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 28.5
28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
827GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3217 2296 1951 1961 1970 1940 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
436% Outstanding
Read 3,061
Write 3,184
Mixed 2,855
SusWrite 2,222
638% 2,831 MB/s
4K Read 82.8
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 117
390% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 1432
DQ Write 1107
DQ Mixed 1,222
927% 1,254 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 436%
Great: 488%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
858GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 382 380 380 384 375 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 486
Mixed 451
SusWrite 379
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 49.5
186% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 346
260% 349 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 116%
Great: 128%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
446GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 282 298 308 277 337 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 246
Write 107
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 305
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 21.2
4K Mixed 8.3
44% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 15.5
DQ Write 17
DQ Mixed 15.8
12% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 102%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
858GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1587 1613 1601 1606 1623 1590 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 1,309
Write 1,503
Mixed 1,356
SusWrite 1,603
327% 1,443 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 87.3
300% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,612
DQ Write 1,199
DQ Mixed 1,347
1,023% 1,386 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 306%
Great: 365%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
858GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 169 167 169 169 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 150
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 168
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE CT16G4DFRA266.M16FR CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE CT16G4DFRA266.M16FR 64GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.6% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 32.2
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 38.7
SC Mixed 31.1
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B560M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7D17) Builds (Compare 1,967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MAG B560M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7D17)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback