Asus CG8270

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus CG8270  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8270
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121225
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateJun 05 '22 at 12:19
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 176
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 456
47% 380 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 13A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 114
Parallax 130
102% 123 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 115
Splatting 106
106% 133 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GSSD230S 512GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02J0T2DA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 247 112 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 460
Write 434
Mixed 410
SusWrite 167
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 38.8
140% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 126
148% 256 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
143GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 114 113 111 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 82.3
Write 95
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 112
56% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
225GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 58 58 56 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 83
Write 62.9
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 58.8
49% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MI64C1D1629Z1 Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-050.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-050.A00LF 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.4% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG8270 Builds (Compare 296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus CG8270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback