MSI H61M-E22/W8 (MS-7788)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 23 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7788
MotherboardMSI H61M-E22/W8 (MS-7788)  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '22 at 19:01
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 161
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 320
42% 318 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
MSI(1462 7788) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.36% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.36%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 75 45 59 60 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 60.2
62% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST31000322CS 1TB-$250
843GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 86 105 110 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 90.2
Write 113
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 103
65% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
26% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-E22/W8 (MS-7788) Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H61M-E22/W8 (MS-7788)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback