Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics74.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive482% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory108.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220401
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 02 '22 at 22:51
Run Duration506 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$210
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 78.1
1-Core 204
2-Core 398
118% 227 Pts
4-Core 714
8-Core 1,329
122% 1,022 Pts
64-Core 2,385
148% 2,385 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 106%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.9% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 82.9
Parallax 89.5
83% 91.4 fps
MRender 85
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 64.6
59% 73.8 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SPCC M.2 PCIe SSD 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3642 3766 3741 3767 3841 3831 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
482% Outstanding
Read 2,290
Write 3904
Mixed 2,283
SusWrite 3,765
696% 3,060 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 273
4K Mixed 93.6
340% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 1,416
DQ Write 1,109
DQ Mixed 1,265
946% 1,263 MB/s
Poor: 166%
This bench: 482%
Great: 482%
Nvme addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 1TB
481GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1495 1527 1050 1052 1050 1053 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,090
Write 1,642
Mixed 598
SusWrite 1,204
256% 1,134 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 41.3
148% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,493
DQ Write 914
DQ Mixed 749
680% 1,052 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 216%
Great: 259%
Nvme PNY CS3040 1TB SSD
687GB free
Firmware: CS304131 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3782 3802 3784 3788 3794 3787 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
458% Outstanding
Read 2,170
Write 3,697
Mixed 2,235
SusWrite 3,790
676% 2,973 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 80.2
257% 94.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,484
DQ Write 1,181
DQ Mixed 1,341
1,001% 1,335 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 458%
Great: 443%
Toshiba HDWR460 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 193 195 196 194 196 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 198
Mixed 110
SusWrite 194
126% 171 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.8
175% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 138%
Seagate ST6000NM0024-1HT17Z 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 181 182 182 180 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 197
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 181
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
228% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 109%
Great: 119%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 139 137 142 135 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 138
Write 146
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 139
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 109%
OOS12000G 12TB
6TB free
Firmware: OOS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 199 201 203 202 202 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 127%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 113 117 113 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 120
Write 154
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 114
76% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.7
251% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 144 144 144 141 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
69% Good
Read 95.5
Write 117
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 144
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
219% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 69%
Great: 94%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 113 117 113 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 138
Write 164
Mixed 85
SusWrite 114
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.8
288% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 92 98 81 101 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 146
Write 157
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 92.9
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.5
218% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 92%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
3TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 123 131 122 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 201
Write 209
Mixed 128
SusWrite 125
219% 166 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 0.9
367% 4.67 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 5.7
DQ Mixed 0.9
227% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 99%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 144 141 142 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 137
Write 150
Mixed 93.4
SusWrite 143
178% 131 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.3
225% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Mushkin MRX4U360JNNM32G MLA4C360JNNM32G MRX4U360JNNM32G MLA4C360JNNM32G 127GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 30.1
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 26.8
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 15,820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 - $181

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback