Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 02 '22 at 11:00
Run Duration410 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 75.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 245
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 827
78% 645 Pts
64-Core 1,269
78% 1,269 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$391
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 160
Parallax 181
148% 174 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 157
Splatting 130
127% 160 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1125 1118 621 611 618 620 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,416
Write 1,175
Mixed 1,154
SusWrite 786
254% 1,132 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 71
232% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 760
DQ Mixed 863
651% 877 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 216%
Great: 340%
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
221GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 255 258 260 261 262 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 424
Write 266
Mixed 295
SusWrite 258
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 31
109% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 184
167% 254 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 91%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
901GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2286 2171 1194 1197 1193 1201 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 2,434
Write 2,281
Mixed 1,686
SusWrite 1,540
445% 1,985 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 75.8
248% 85.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,065
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 936
700% 936 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 310%
Great: 372%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
447GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 437 440 443 443 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 438
Mixed 415
SusWrite 394
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 30.3
133% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 49.5
106% 213 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$23
923GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 150 150 150 149 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 142
Write 140
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 150
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 166 163 166 165 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 162
Mixed 108
SusWrite 164
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 101%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 117 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 115
Write 117
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 119
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 83%
WDC WD80 04FRYZ-01VAEB0 8TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4 2.3 1.7 1.5 1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.6% Good
Read 241
Write 242
Mixed 143
SusWrite 2.4
196% 157 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 1.4
363% 4.53 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 6.3
DQ Mixed 1.9
283% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 64%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4 2.3 1.7 1.5 1.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 134
Write 113
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 2.4
86% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.9
283% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 84%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 166 170 172 176 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 159
Write 147
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 170
190% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 71%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 169 171 171 176 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68% Good
Read 181
Write 195
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 171
216% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 68%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 24.9
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 23.8
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $799
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback