HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3398
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '22 at 23:03
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570S
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570S CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 63
1-Core 42.5
2-Core 78.8
40% 61.4 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 168
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 3398) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.63 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.7
1% 1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$66
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 430 447 447 342 344 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 445
Mixed 429
SusWrite 405
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 39.9
126% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 321
244% 330 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 USDT Builds (Compare 542 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback