Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200818
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateMay 30 '22 at 02:18
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 635
68% 544 Pts
64-Core 631
39% 631 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
PowerColor(148C 2401) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.2% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 65.6
Parallax 96.5
55% 76.5 fps
MRender 53.3
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 42.7
47% 58.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 119 71 70 65 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 492
Write 439
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 96.9
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 20
80% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 1.1
64% 147 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 92%
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
350GB free
Firmware: S8542105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 631 629 627 625 622 625 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 685
Write 609
Mixed 596
SusWrite 626
142% 629 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 27.3
169% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 700
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 392
355% 543 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 142%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.BAGM6.40C0B 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
76.8% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 22.8
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 23.5
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback