Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '22 at 23:41
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3258-$38
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 237
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 240
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Lighting 69.2
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 65.7
56% 69.8 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 67.4
Splatting 57.6
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 235 240 240 239 241 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 421
Write 427
Mixed 355
SusWrite 243
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 46
178% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 219
203% 313 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 102%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLE4G3D1869DE1TX0. 1315 BLE4G3D1608DE1TX0. 1315 BLE4G3D1869DE1TX0. 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 17.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H - $51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback