Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '22 at 01:10
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 152
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 576
56% 460 Pts
64-Core 723
45% 723 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3684) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Lighting 64.6
Reflection 69
Parallax 61.6
53% 65.1 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 54.1
50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 167 171 162 147 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 370
Write 149
Mixed 133
SusWrite 163
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 29.4
104% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 115
116% 191 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 105%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 89 93 89 91 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 98.9
Write 104
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 90.3
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89
1.5TB free
Firmware: SD19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 121 122 124 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 122
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 70%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 74 73 74 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 73.2
Write 77.9
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 73.4
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 100 103 101 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 92.7
Write 94.8
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 100
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 87%
WDC WD40 E31X-00HY4A0 4TB
728GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 63 63 64 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.6% Below average
Read 114
Write 70
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 61.6
95% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 40%
WDC WD40 PURX-64N96Y0 4TB
290GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 63 63 64 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.4% Below average
Read 104
Write 106
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 61.7
109% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 42.7
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 21.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback