PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock X99 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180406 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 24 '22 at 01:10 |
Run Duration | 212 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
69.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3684) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.77
|
51.6%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 167 171 162 147 162 MB/s
|
67.1%
Good
|
|||
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 89 93 89 91 89 MB/s
|
54.4%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89
1.5TB free
Firmware: SD19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 121 122 124 122 MB/s
|
69.5%
Good
|
|||
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 74 73 74 73 MB/s
|
42.2%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 100 103 101 100 MB/s
|
55.5%
Above average
|
|||
WDC WD40 E31X-00HY4A0 4TB
728GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 63 63 64 62 MB/s
|
37.6%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD40 PURX-64N96Y0 4TB
290GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 63 63 64 62 MB/s
|
37.4%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
108%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 474x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 109x |
Core i7-5960XIntel $504Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 48x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 85x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 77x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 46x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Outstanding | Total price: $768 |