| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150810 |
| Uptime | 4.4 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 27 '18 at 18:13 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
75.8%
Very good
|
72% 122 Pts
|
58% 470 Pts
|
47% 755 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
53.5%
Above average
|
54% 67.2 fps
|
53% 65.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 375 330 333 278 299 MB/s
|
87.1%
Excellent
|
84% 374 MB/s
|
136% 45.3 MB/s
|
168% 189 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB
69GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 19 18 18 16 5.6 MB/s
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
31% 24.9 MB/s
|
166% 3.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70%
Very good
|
73% 25.4 GB/s
|
52% 18.1 GB/s
|
55% 73 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 484 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 228x |
| Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 103x |
| Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 52x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples | 40x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 39x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 37x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 42% - Average | Total price: $1,193 |