Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Memory 31.2 1-Core 58.2 2-Core 111 36% 66.9 Pts	4-Core 131 8-Core 129 18% 130 Pts	64-Core 172 11% 172 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0100 2782) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.41% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 1.9 2% 2 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 0.2 1% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.41% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac S535N8/256GYN 256GB 120 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0330A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 232 342 355 355 362 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	60% Above average	Read 366 Write 279 Mixed 297 SusWrite 309 70% 313 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 40.2 4K Mixed 14.7 61% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 37.4 67% 131 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 80%
Generic MassStorageClass 537GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 467GB free, PID 0761 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 19 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.8% Very poor	Read 5 Write 3.2 Mixed 6.5 SusWrite 19.4 13% 8.52 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 2.2 229% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 9.2 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 248 16% 248 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	49x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	49x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	36x
123456789012345678 2x4GBABCDBench 24%, 783 samples	13x