Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Memory 38.8 1-Core 57.9 2-Core 114 39% 70.2 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 223 29% 219 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0100 2782) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1960 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.94% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 2.5 2% 2.4 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.2 2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.94% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac S535N8/256GYN 256GB 120 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0330A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 307 186 131 109 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 364 Write 315 Mixed 314 SusWrite 187 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 16.2 72% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 37 77% 154 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 80%
Generic MassStorageClass 537GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 467GB free, PID 0761 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.9% Very poor	Read 2 Write 18 Mixed 3.5 SusWrite 18.7 16% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 2.2 237% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	27% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 12.1 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 208 19% 208 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	49x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	49x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	36x
123456789012345678 2x4GBABCDBench 24%, 783 samples	13x