HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8308
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170703
Uptime510.7 Days
Run DateMay 21 '22 at 11:46
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 198
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 346
42% 324 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (65 fps cap detected)
52.6% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 60.6
53% 63.6 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 65.5
Splatting 61.1
52% 63.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 512GB
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1014 565 570 276 302 347 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 861
Write 1,819
Mixed 1,090
SusWrite 512
243% 1,071 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 72.2
228% 87.7 MB/s
DQ Read 591
DQ Write 1,011
DQ Mixed 1,001
703% 868 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 173%
Great: 275%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
930GB free
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 207 204 205 203 206 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 196
Mixed 82
SusWrite 203
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 117%
Great: 112%
Kingston DataTraveler 160 32GB
29GB free, PID 1646
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.7 14 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
8.33% Terrible
Read 23.5
Write 13
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 11
16% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1
69% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.33%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.2% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 14.8
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $445
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback