Gigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131231
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 21 '22 at 08:48
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 176
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 473
47% 386 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1138) 2GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.6% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 46.1
Parallax 41.7
35% 43.5 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 41
Splatting 36
31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3B00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 40 35 88 19 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.4% Below average
Read 206
Write 209
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 76.3
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 7.5
52% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 15.3
DQ Write 93.2
DQ Mixed 8.5
20% 39 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-582.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
26.8% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.4
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77M-D3H Builds (Compare 874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H - $145

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $529
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback