LG 17Z95P-K.AAE8U1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive318% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLG 17Z95P-K.AAE8U1  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 17Z95P
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211006
Uptime4 Days
Run DateMay 20 '22 at 04:46
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1195G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 59.3
1-Core 147
2-Core 291
86% 166 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 650
72% 565 Pts
64-Core 633
39% 633 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1854 0459) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9836
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 32.4
21% 29.3 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 35.6
Splatting 21.7
22% 27.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2185 1634 858 827 834 854 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,444
Write 2,452
Mixed 1697
SusWrite 1,199
437% 1,948 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 90.5
299% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,304
DQ Write 1,147
DQ Mixed 1,196
905% 1,216 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 318%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 46.8
MC Write 61.9
MC Mixed 48.4
150% 52.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 17.1
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 132%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 17Z95P-K.AAE8U1 Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: LG 17Z95P-K.AAE8U1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback