In-sing K14J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemIn-sing K14J  (all builds)
MotherboardIn-Sing K14J
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '22 at 07:10
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 169
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 337
39% 305 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Intel(8086 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.59% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 3.3
2% 3.23 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.59%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 866 837 831 877 880 808 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,345
Write 899
Mixed 862
SusWrite 850
221% 989 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 74.6
262% 93.2 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 539
DQ Mixed 217
225% 360 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 206%
Great: 209%
Sandisk Extreme Pro 55AF 1TB
349GB free
Firmware: 1085
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 374 373 389 387 385 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 274
Write 347
Mixed 303
SusWrite 381
74% 327 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 28.9
88% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 36.2
61% 118 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron H9CCNNNCLTMLAR-NUD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
62.8% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 19.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 20.2
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K14J Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: In-sing K14J

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback