In-sing NK81J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemIn-sing NK81J  (all builds)
MotherboardIn-Sing NK81J
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '20 at 21:34
Run Duration342 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 3867U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 105
46% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 98.3
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 96.3
6% 96.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Device(1E8B 1E8B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 2.97
Reflection 4.58
Parallax 3.31
2% 3.62 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 8.13
5% 5.65 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 243 243 237 287 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 344
Write 246
Mixed 246
SusWrite 253
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 12.1
50% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 28.3
DQ Mixed 42.6
57% 111 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron H9CCNNNCLTMLAR-NUD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.9% Average
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 17.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NK81J Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: In-sing NK81J

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback