In-sing K14J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemIn-sing K14J  (all builds)
MotherboardIn-Sing K14J
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '20 at 17:12
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 239
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 589
65% 514 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Intel(8086 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.92% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3.96
Parallax 2.88
2% 3.28 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 6.09
4% 4.51 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.92%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 875 917 895 918 924 666 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,389
Write 930
Mixed 881
SusWrite 866
227% 1,017 MB/s
4K Read 61.8
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 76.3
290% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 828
DQ Mixed 221
271% 459 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 223%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron H9CCNNNCLTMLAR-NUD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 19.6
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 21
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 96.5
41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K14J Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: In-sing K14J

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback