Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL X99
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '22 at 06:05
Run Duration380 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 159
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 750
66% 558 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS2130 1TB SSD
514GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS213530
SusWrite @10s intervals: 865 148 116 180 172 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,217
Write 1,874
Mixed 1,219
SusWrite 268
258% 1,144 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 58.4
182% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 684
DQ Write 471
DQ Mixed 41.9
176% 399 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 148%
Great: 298%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
449GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 446 445 443 446 452 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 444
Mixed 397
SusWrite 449
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 49.2
168% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 181
150% 223 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
PNY CS900 480GB-$42
266GB free
Firmware: 0615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 419 207 104 105 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 433
Write 382
Mixed 338
SusWrite 225
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 36.1
138% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 194
177% 269 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 87%
Great: 102%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
335GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 460 457 448 453 458 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 418
Write 448
Mixed 382
SusWrite 455
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 39.1
142% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 104%
Great: 121%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB
1GB free, PID 2038, generic
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 1.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.86% Terrible
Read 11.9
Write 1.7
Mixed 3
SusWrite 2.2
5% 4.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
24% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.86%
Great: 4%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
25GB free, PID 9917, genereic
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 7.5 7.2 7.8 7.9 6 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
6.49% Terrible
Read 23.9
Write 24.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 7.7
19% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.49%
Great: 10%
Mass Storage Device 16GB
15GB free, PID 125d, generic
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9 4 10 12 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 20.7
Write 11.7
Mixed 14.9
SusWrite 9.7
18% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 4
257% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40EB1-CRC M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB 64GB
2133, 2400, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
122% Outstanding
MC Read 56.1
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 47.5
140% 49.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 18.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 122%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback