Lenovo F0EK007HUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo F0EK007HUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3701
Memory4.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190812
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 14 '22 at 04:52
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 196
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 548
58% 465 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Legend(17AA 3701) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9030
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.78% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 7.2
5% 7 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 10.4
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.78%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXH7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 771
Write 180
Mixed 174
81% 375 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 25.6
121% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 568
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 178
172% 285 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 279%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
28GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4.2 4.5 3.7 4.9 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
5.13% Terrible
Read 16.4
Write 1.5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 4.5
7% 7.02 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.7
81% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.13%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
63.5% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 17.5
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 18.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F0EK007HUS Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0EK007HUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback