Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 13 '22 at 05:45
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 196
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 496
53% 421 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.6% Very good
Lighting 89.3
Reflection 87.2
Parallax 83.4
73% 86.6 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 78
Splatting 71
69% 87.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 333 326 311 313 315 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 479
Write 357
Mixed 303
SusWrite 311
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 31.3
110% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 249
215% 319 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
682GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 427 448 405 404 404 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 448
Mixed 380
SusWrite 395
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 39.6
130% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 144
169% 291 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
714GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 128 133 133 134 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 124
Write 109
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 126
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 84%
USB 2.0 FLASH DISK 2GB
1GB free, PID 0105
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Read 11
Write 3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4.5
7% 5.75 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 18.6
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0E03 U32H75x
Typical P8Z77-V DELUXE Builds (Compare 888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $529
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback