Asus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220208
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 12 '22 at 20:46
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$179
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 83.5
1-Core 162
2-Core 323
101% 189 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 1,004
100% 817 Pts
64-Core 1,514
94% 1,514 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
164% Outstanding
Lighting 244
Reflection 220
Parallax 215
199% 226 fps
MRender 251
Gravity 161
Splatting 132
142% 181 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 164%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
603GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1987 1958 322 384 348 282 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,670
Write 2,064
Mixed 1,735
SusWrite 880
358% 1,587 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 74
248% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,171
DQ Write 947
DQ Mixed 1,040
784% 1,053 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 245%
Great: 365%
LDLC 120GB
110GB free
Firmware: Q0601B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 65 64 64 58 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 475
Write 341
Mixed 349
SusWrite 110
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 22.9
118% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 31.1
78% 160 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 87%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
148GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 109 107 109 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 81.4
Write 140
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 109
65% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.2
393% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
42GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 96 94 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 68.9
Write 91.1
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 96.3
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
69% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 106%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
251GB free, PID a00d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 20 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 35.9
Mixed 22
SusWrite 20.6
38% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 44%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB
473GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 33
Mixed 32
SusWrite 21.9
41% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3600 C18 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.3% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 20.6
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 23.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING Builds (Compare 2,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $784
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback