HP ProDesk 400 G3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8061
Memory16.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '22 at 10:39
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 86.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 221
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 619
64% 515 Pts
64-Core 631
39% 631 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
MSI(1462 8E90) ≥ 4GB; MSI RTX 3060 AERO ITX
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.88
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.9% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 116
Parallax 133
109% 128 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 99.1
Splatting 75.3
82% 104 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 41 44 66 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 13.2
Write 52.9
Mixed 52
SusWrite 57.7
33% 44 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.2% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 21.3
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 21
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G3 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback