Asus P8H77-V LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V LE  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140317
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 11 '22 at 16:04
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 94.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 203
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 520
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.4% Good
Lighting 76.5
Reflection 80
Parallax 73.7
62% 76.7 fps
MRender 71.9
Gravity 76
Splatting 71
60% 73 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 291 297 292 299 282 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 364
Write 296
Mixed 241
SusWrite 290
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 27.7
98% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 31.8
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 37.5
37% 56.6 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 128%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
190GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,629
Write 4078
Mixed 4,563
1,057% 4,757 MB/s
4K Read 332
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 61.3
647% 172 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 463
DQ Mixed 555
351% 386 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
66GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 49 49 50 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 42.7
Write 33.7
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 48.8
30% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 49%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
845GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 109 113 109 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 55
SusWrite 110
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
688GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 49 49 50 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 156
Write 141
Mixed 38
SusWrite 49.1
70% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDT721016SLA380 160GB
71GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.5% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 35.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 40
49% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 859B BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 99U5471-012.A00LF 859B BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 19
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-V LE Builds (Compare 1,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V LE - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback